 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Puertas v. Overton, No. 04-2405,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate was properly denied 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 relief on his claim that the prosecution violated Brady by failing to provide him with a state police report investigating allegations of public corruption because the inmate either knew the substance of the report's contents or knew enough to have discovered that information based upon further inquiry.
|
|||||
| United States v. Payne, No. 05-1280,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Decided , February 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not erroneously admit out-of-court statements of a co-conspirator under Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) because defendant's membership in conspiracy was proved by preponderance of the evidence as defendant and co-conspirator discussed "buying" clothes at the store with counterfeit currency before, during, and after the transaction.
|
|||||
| United States v. Richardson, No. 05-1260,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Decided , February 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a district court noted defendant's history of violence, including violent crimes committed days before the robbery for which defendant was being sentenced, as well as defendant's need for drug treatment, it properly considered 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors when determining what sentence to impose.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
