 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Eastman v. Marine Mech. Corp., No. 03-4591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided , February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Remand of an employment case was ordered because a state-law employment action for wrongful termination in violation of federal public policy did not present a substantial federal question over which federal courts could have exercised "arising under" jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1331.
|
|||||
| Halvorsen v. Plato Learning, Inc., No. 05-5325,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted to an employer in a retaliatory discharge claim based on public policy under Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-101 because there was no agreement within the meaning of § 47-25-101; moreover, case law regarding a firing of an employee due to the employment of a spouse by a competitor was rejected.
|
|||||
| May v. Franklin County Comm'rs, No. 05-3188,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided , February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted to a county and others in a 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 case relating to a domestic violence death because none of the acts in responding to or answering a victim's 911 calls for help, although not faultless, directly increased the victim's vulnerability to danger or placed her in harm's way.
|
|||||
| United States v. Katzopoulos, No. 04-6501,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2006, Decided , February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although courts had questioned continuing validity of allowing testimonial hearsay at sentencing post-Crawford and post-Booker, Sixth Circuit held that, without a clear directive from Supreme Court, it would continue to observe its precedent that testimonial hearsay did not affect a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation at sentencing.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
