 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gjoni v. Gonzales, No. 04-3801,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Albanian citizen's asylum application under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1158, 1101 was properly denied based on failure to demonstrate well-founded fear of political persecution; substantial evidence supported finding that his testimony was incredible and that he failed to sufficiently corroborate testimony. Summary affirmance did not violate due process rights.
|
|||||
| Mischer v. Erie Metro Hous. Auth., No. 05-3018,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Title VII race and gender discrimination claims of a former executive director of a local housing agency failed on summary judgment because even though she made a prima facie showing of discriminatory discharge, she was unable to refute the agency's legitimate and nondiscriminatory reasons for discharging her only two months after she was hired.
|
|||||
| Sene v. Gonzales, Nos. 04-3794, 04-4115,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien facing removal did not meet the requirements for an ineffective assistance claim under the Fifth Amendment since there was no evidence that she informed her former counsel of the charge or that she filed a disciplinary complaint against former counsel or else provided an explanation for why one was not filed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Abboud, Nos. 04-3942/04-3943,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for bank fraud, under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1344; money laundering, under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1957; and failure to file income tax returns, under 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 7203 and 7206; were affirmed as the trial court properly denied a motion to suppress evidence. Further, the evidence was sufficient to support the bank fraud and money laundering convictions.
|
|||||
| Women's Med. Prof'l Corp. v. Baird, Nos. 03-4249; 04-3060,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Decided , February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed the district court's decision with respect to its conclusions that the application of the transfer agreement requirement (and license requirement) to the Dayton clinic constituted an undue burden under Casey and that the Dayton-area hospitals had an unconstitutional third-party veto over the Dayton clinic's license.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
