 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Swenson v. Pramstaller, No. 04-2355,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A prisoner was properly denied in forma pauperis status in a civil rights action against prison officials because his speculative claims that his sleepwalking would injure him or upset the cellmate that he did not have did not fall within the imminent danger exception to the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(g).
|
|||||
| United States v. Perry, No. 04-4506,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, February 24, 2006, Decided , February 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of defendant's subsequent bank robbery under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) during his trial on the first robbery because the evidence was admitted for a proper purpose, namely to identify the robber of the instant robbery, and the two robberies were similar.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
