 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Nieto, No. 05-6361,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was ample evidence from which a jury could conclude that defendant knowingly entered into an agreement with the co-defendant to violate the drug laws, and that defendant actively participated in the conspiracy because co-defendant testified that after he completed the drug transaction, he surrendered the money to defendant.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ruiz-Chavez, No. 06-1063,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Seventy-eight month sentence was reasonable, as any disparity between defendant's sentence and sentences in "fast-track" districts did not violate 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a)'s instruction to avoid unnecessary sentencing disparities. Fast-track sentence reductions were statutorily authorized due to unique problems regarding immigration in some districts.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
