 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Haas v. Quest Recovery Servs., No. 05-3147,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Eleventh Amendment barred plaintiffs' equal protection claims under the ADA, with regard to discrimination that one plaintiff suffered due to her disabilities while participating in a drug and alcohol treatment program because the State of Ohio was not required to make special accommodations for the disabled, so long as its actions were rational.
|
|||||
| Pack v. Martin, No. 04-2218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's dismissal of a pro se state inmate's § 1983 case was affirmed because he failed to state a claim for relief and he had not exhausted his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C.S. § 1997e(a).
|
|||||
| Stuart v. Wilson, No. 05-3092,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Decided , March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no clearly established federal law that required an alleged child victim to be unavailable before his hearsay statements could be admitted under a hearsay exception that was not firmly rooted, and because the victim's statements exhibited sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness, there was no Confrontation Clause violation.
|
|||||
| United States v. Canaca, No. 04-2211,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to resentencing under Booker because the appellate court was unable to perform meaningful reasonableness review of the alternative sentence without any articulation by the district court of the reasons for imposing the chosen sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
