 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Nat'l Solid Wastes Mgmt. Ass'n v. Daviess County, No. 04-6498,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for a rehearing was denied because there was no ambiguity, misstatement, or oversight with respect to the fact that association's members were forced to pay higher prices which demonstrated constitutional standing and regulation prevented contracting with out-of-state parties which demonstrated prudential standing under Commerce Clause.
|
|||||
| Officemax, Inc. v. United States, No. 04-4009,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Gundy, No. 04-1585,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's denial of inmate's petition for habeas relief was affirmed. Although clearly established as a constitutional violation, the act of routine shackling was subject to review for harmless error. The evidence against the inmate was truly overwhelming; accordingly, the state court's shackling of the inmate constituted harmless error.
|
|||||
| United States v. Bolanos, Case No. 05-1452,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the district court had consulted the Sentencing Guidelines and explained its decision not to select a sentence outside of the applicable Guidelines range, and where defendant had not overcome the presumption that a sentence selected from within the applicable Guidelines range was reasonable, the appellate court affirmed the 84 month sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Henderson, No. 05-1546,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed. As defendant did not allege that he was unaware of factual predicate underlying his selective prosecution claim that Project Safe Neighborhoods was unconstitutionally race-based, his failure to argue selective prosecution regarding claim to district court precluded appellate review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(e).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
