 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Khan v. Gonzales, No. 05-3233,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the Immigration Judge noted that the lead asylee's testimony lacked corroboration, and also found that the testimony lacked credibility, the appellate court agreed with the Board that the Immigration Judge did not act arbitrarily in discounting the husband's testimony about his house and the extensive nature of the torture he received.
|
|||||
| Young v. Oakland County, No. 05-1162,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the appellate court determined that the employee, who applied for Chief Community Corrections Field Operations, could not show that he was similarly situated to the person who was chosen for the position as the employee did not have the same extensive criminal justice background, entry of summary judgment in favor of employer affirmed.
|
|||||
| Bezark v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 05-5522,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the employee had admitted that he was able to perform, and was performing, the functions of basic everyday living, such as caring for himself and driving to and from work, as a matter of law, the district court properly held that the employee could not show that his multiple sclerosis was an ADA disability, and summary judgment was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Meoli v. Citicorp Trust Bank (In re Oswalt), No. 05-1075,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Decided , April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendment of Michigan Mobile Home Commission Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 125.2330i, clarified the procedure for perfecting security interests in affixed mobile homes. Because the amendment clarified existing law and was not a new law, it related back to and controls the attachment of the security interest in the debtors' mobile home.
|
|||||
| United States v. Willis, NO. 05-5434,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the court did not expressly mention all of the factors of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553, it expressly indicated that it had considered them, and specified its reasoning on the record. It was not required to do more.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
