 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Todd v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A., No. 04-4109,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wesley v. Curtis, No. 03-2422,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a state inmate was not aware of a state trial court's failure to rule on a motion for new trial, the failure to rule on the motion did not prevent inmate from filing his notice of appeal. Thus, rather than having been denied his right to appeal and, thus, his right to due process, the inmate abandoned his right to appeal.
|
|||||
| Am. & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Sequatchie Concrete Servs., No. 04-6524,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Washington v. Dove, No. 05-5820,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clearly, the U.S. Parole Commission had statutory authority to make parole determinations in a federal prisoner's case, and a determination that a prisoner had failed to accept responsibility for allegedly murdering the victim was supported on the record and a departure from the parole guidelines was warranted given the cruelty of the crime.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Ohio Dep't of Job & Family Servs., No. 04-4399,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Male employee of the State of Ohio failed to establish a prima facie case of reverse discrimination under Title VII when he was transferred to a different position following the merger of two departments, which resulted in a reduction in force; the employee failed to offer evidence that he was singled out for transfer because he was a male.
|
|||||
| Woody v. Marberry, No. 05-1403,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied 28 U.S.C.S. § 2241 petition where state court sentence did not qualify for credit on federal sentence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3585(b); district court erred, however, in recharacterizing portion of petition as 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 petition without giving prisoner warnings of potential consequences as required under Castro.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
