LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 6th Circuit Court of Appeals - May 4, 2006

  
Carter v. Bank One, No. 05-5201, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In dismissing the case as a matter of comity, the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that findings about the scope and perhaps the validity of a freeze order should have been made initially by the Alabama court that entered the freeze order, which was in the best position to know what that order intended to cover.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gregory v. City of Louisville, Case No: 04-5856, 04-6482, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hubbard v. Gross, No. 05-5088, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because there was no dispute that plaintiff pushed an officer and was kicking at other officers, there was probable cause to arrest plaintiff and indict for third degree assault. There was no constitutional violation and qualified immunity on the federal malicious prosecution claim was proper in plaintiff's 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 action.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Konate v. Gonzales, No. 04-4492, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Without describing its analysis, court upheld denial of an alien's application for asylum and other relief; IJ identified inconsistencies that undermined alien's credibility and relief upon relevant State Department country reports to discount alien's fear that her daughter would be subjected to female genital mutilation in Republic of Congo.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Toma v. Gonzales, No. 04-4310, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Even though a Iraqi Chaldean Christian established past persecution thereby establishing a presumption of future persecution, the overthrow of the Iraqi regime was substantial evidence that the presumption of future persecution based on past persecution had been successfully rebutted. She was not entitled to asylum relief, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Chalmers, No. 05-6137, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant conceded at his plea hearing that the counterfeit checks underlying his conviction totaled $ 42,000, and the United States presented evidence at sentencing that the amounts in the checks exceeded $ 42,000, ample evidence supported the enhancement of defendant's sentence per U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1(b)(1)(D).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Ibarra, No. 05-2196, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Jackson, NO. 05-3239, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Bank robbery conviction was affirmed because defendant relinquished his right to self-representation, his motion to suppress evidence seized after a stop and frisk was properly denied, there was no error in granting defense counsel's motion for a mental competency examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 424, and the Speedy Trial Act was not violated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.