 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jaber v. Gonzales, No. 05-3882,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 22, 2007, Decided , May 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following BIA's affirmance of denial of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1186a(c)(4) waiver request and of IJ's refusal to reopen, there was no statutory basis for court to hear Lebanese native's petition for review of BIA's refusal to reopen; denial was not issued until after habeas petition was filed and district court transferred case under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(a)(5).
|
|||||
| Peete v. Metro. Gov't, No. 06-5321,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 22, 2007, Decided , May 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in denying qualified immunity to paramedics in § 1983 wrongful death action; restraint of individual in unconscious epileptic state during attempt to render aid did not constitute a "seizure" under U.S. Const. amend. IV. Any failure to render appropriate medical treatment did not constitute violation of U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
|
|||||
| United States v. Tackett, No. 06-5182,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 22, 2007, Decided , May 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in denying motion to suppress silencers and firearm found during inventory search of defendant's backpack, as there was no Fourth Amendment violation. Evidence supported existence of inventory policy based on officers' testimony that they relied on standard policy of inventorying all personal items and opening containers.
|
|||||
| Riverview Trenton R.R. v. DSC, Ltd. (In re DSC, Ltd.), No. 06-1813,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2007, Decided , May 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court found that the bankruptcy court did not err in establishing and enforcing a joinder deadline because 11 U.S.C.S. § 303 did not prohibit the court from setting an earlier deadline in order to ensure efficient proceedings.
|
|||||
| United States v. Brika, No. 05-4537,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2007, Decided , May 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence of 156 months of imprisonment for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 875 was considered to be reasonable because the district court had considered the fact that defendant had little criminal history, his family and friends extended warm support for him, and while he was incarcerated, he had done several good things.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
