 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. Carlton, No. 05-5829,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tennessee prisoner was properly denied habeas relief under § 2254 following murder conviction; any error in jury instruction on robbery elements did not violate due process rights under U.S. Const. amend. XIV because error was harmless. There was overwhelming evidence from which jury could conclude that prisoner killed while perpetrating robbery.
|
|||||
| Ford Motor Co. v. Mustangs Unlimited, Inc., No. 06-1537,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 24, 2007, Decided , May 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a trademark infringement action resulting in a consent judgment, an order of a federal district court granting an automobile corporation's motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) was vacated as it did not make an explicit determination that the circumstances were extraordinary or exceptional, justifying such relief.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. , No. 05-4369,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 24, 2007, Decided , May 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reasons that were given for discounting opinions of treating physicians and for finding subjective complaints regarding fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis not credible were insufficient to constitute substantial evidence. Residual functioning capacity finding and its use in deciding claimant could return to her past relevant work were flawed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Campbell, No. 06-3321,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 24, 2007, Decided , May 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of motion to suppress evidence was reversed because the officer had probable cause to believe that defendant had committed the misdemeanor offense of driving without proof of a license; therefore, the ensuing warrantless arrest did not violate defendant's constitutional rights and officers could perform an inventory search of the car.
|
|||||
| Van Hook v. Anderson, No. 03-4207,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 24, 2007, Decided , May 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a mother had conveyed her son's interest to speak with police regarding a murder, the discussion that ensued that led to the son's confession to the murder did not run afoul of the son's U.S. Const. amend. V rights. A third party could communicate a suspect's desire to initiate a discussion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
