 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aleks Gjelaj v. Gonzales, No. 05-3204,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regardless of whether the asylee had endured any past persecution in his home country, he was not eligible for asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158 because changed conditions in his homeland rebutted any presumption that he would have been subjected to future persecution upon removal or that he could have had well-founded fear of such future persecution.
|
|||||
| Danner v. Motley, No. 04-5363,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 11, 2006, Decided , May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's Confrontation Clause rights were not violated when his allegedly abused daughter, though 15, testified against him via closed circuit per Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 421.350. Compelling need determination was supported by findings that her reliability was at stake, and that the inmate was the cause of her distress, which was not de minimis.
|
|||||
| LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. Legacy, No. 04-2396,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Michigan courts broadly applied res judicata to bar claims that already had been, or in exercise of reasonable diligence, could have been litigated, bank's failure to raise issue of its redemption right according to Mich. Comp. Laws § 211.140 (1999) (repealed) was an issue that could have been raised in purchaser's prior quiet title action.
|
|||||
| Meridia Prods. Liab. Litig. v. Abbott Labs., No. 04-4175,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 11, 2006, Decided , May 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly granted summary judgment for pharmaceutical company in multi-district product liability action filed by consumers of diet drug Meridia; label adequately warned learned intermediary of possible effects on blood pressure. Pharmacologist's testimony on effect of high blood pressure was properly excluded under Fed. R. Evid. 702.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
