 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aerel, S.R.L. v. PCC Airfoils, L.L.C., No. 05-3864,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Decided , May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for a manufacturer was affirmed because the district court properly interpreted a contract to allow no commissions on prior orders to an agent after the contract period had expired and rejected the argument that the contract was ambiguous. An alleged oral modification was not supported by new consideration.
|
|||||
| Bazzetta v. Caruso, No. 04-1823,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court decided under Fed. R. App. P. 39(a) not to tax costs against appellee prisoners and their visitors; the litigation was taken in good faith, the issues posed significant public policy concerns, the case was difficult, and there was no necessity on the part of the prevailing party, the Michigan prison system, for a cost award.
|
|||||
| DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cox, No. 05-1716,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Decided , May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 800.401 et seq., was preempted by ERISA in cases where prisoners refused to inform pension plans of prison address because wardens' notices to pension plans to redirect benefits to institutional account effectuated assignment or alienation in violation of 29 U.S.C.S. § 1056(d)(1).
|
|||||
| Duha v. Agrium, Inc., Nos. 04-2505/2548,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Decided , May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because district court erred in its weighing of the relative ease of access to documents and live testimony and, in balancing convenience of the alternative forums, disregarded a substantial portion of the employee's 45 counts that arose from his employment and termination in Argentina, dismissal on forum non conveniens ground was inappropriate.
|
|||||
| Logan v. United States, No. 04-5325,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McGee v. Marcum, No. 05-5808,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a bankruptcy debtor pleaded guilty to criminal charges for violations of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act that led to a miner's death, the judgment awarded in a related wrongful death action was dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6) because that judgment was not for a "willful and malicious injury."
|
|||||
| Miller v. Admin. Office of the Courts, No. 05-5981,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Decided , May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly dismissed former public employee's claims against officials in their individual capacities based on qualified immunity; although employee might have been tenured under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18A.095(3), reasonable officers in defendants' positions would not have known that her termination without due process was unlawful.
|
|||||
| Patel v. Gonzales, No. 04-3829,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
