 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Elias v. Gonzales, No. 06-3366,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 15, 2007, Decided , June 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of alien's asylum applications and requests for withholding of removal and relief under CAT was vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings before a different IJ because the IJ's intemperate conduct during the hearing demonstrated bias and hostility toward the alien and the IJ had since then been removed from the bench.
|
|||||
| Matovski v. Gonzales, No. 05-4534,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 15, 2007, Decided , June 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court reversed the BIA's ruling affirming that Immigration Judges lacked jurisdiction over 8 U.S.C.S. § 1154(j) portability determinations and remanded the adjudication of petitioners' renewed adjustment of status applications to the IJ for further proceedings in conjunction with proper application of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1154(j).
|
|||||
| United States v. Bailey, No. 05-6218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 15, 2007, Decided , June 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for violations of 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 846 and 841 and 18 U.S.C.S. § 2 was affirmed because the sentence fell within the range stated in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual and was presumptively reasonable. It was not error for the district court to fail to state on the record that the Guidelines were advisory.
|
|||||
| Walls v. Konteh, No. 06-3472,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 15, 2007, Decided , June 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of habeas petition alleging violation Double Jeopardy Clause was vacated because before declaring a mistrial, trial judge considered the alternative course of instructing the jury to return the next day. However, he concluded that the jury would not be able to devote its full attention to the evidence because of September 11, 2001 attacks.
|
|||||
| Yidong Bu v. Gonzales, No. 05-4663,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 15, 2007, Decided , June 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's case was remanded for reconsideration because substantial evidence did not support IJ's conclusion that alien's detention and abuse were not based on the political opinion he expressed through his protest against corruption by factory officials because Chinese government deemed criticism of government corruption to be political expression.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
