 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beard v. Whitmore Lake Sch. Dist., No. 06-1452,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted to school district in students' § 1983 action alleging U.S. Const. amend. IV violation based on illegal strip search conducted by teachers; district was not deliberately indifferent to risk that teachers would engage in unconstitutional searches and did not have custom of tolerating unconstitutional searches.
|
|||||
| Beshkenadze v. Gonzales, No. 06-3558,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where substantial evidence supported the Immigration Judge's conclusion that an asylum applicant was not eligible for asylum, he could not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of deportation; therefore, the relief sought under the Convention Against Torture could not be granted.
|
|||||
| Cone v. Bell, No. 99-5279,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Decided , June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Death by electrocution did not violate U.S. Const. amend. VIII where defendant had committed his crimes in 1980 and where he had chosen electrocution over lethal injection. Neither the United States Supreme Court nor the Sixth Circuit had concluded that electrocution offended the standards of decency that marked the progress of society.
|
|||||
| Drew v. Parker, No. 05-6473,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was not violated when the trial court instructed the jury on a flight instruction. Even the inmate did not claim that he ran from the store after stealing the money to his prison escapee status and not because of the theft.
|
|||||
| Duncan v. Jackson, Nos. 05-6664, 05-6801,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where family member and others who were present at a residence during an FBI search sued a police chief and sheriff under § 1983, the chief and sheriff were improperly denied qualified immunity on plaintiffs' claims under the Fourth Amendment, except for as to a husband and wife, as they alone owned the residence and, thus, had standing.
|
|||||
| EEOC v. Lucent Techs., Inc., No. 06-5414,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly granted summary judgment for employer in EEOC's action alleging race discrimination in violation of Title VII; EEOC did not establish any material factual dispute with respect to the issue of pretext because there was no evidence in the record to suggest that terminated employee did not receive lowest skills matrix rating.
|
|||||
| Eb-Bran Prods. v. Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp., Nos. 05-2699 and 06-1670,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision that res judicata barred plaintiff's claims was proper as federal court applied federal law in determining preclusive effect of prior federal judgment, at least where jurisdiction in prior litigation was based on federal question, and summary judgment based on statute of limitations was a final judgment on merits for res judicata purposes.
|
|||||
| Hamilton County Bd. of Comm'rs v. NFL, No. 06-3348,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Decided , June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County could not satisfy the test for fraudulent concealment in order to toll the antitrust statute of limitations, 15 U.S.C.S. § 15b, because it knew before, during, and immediately after the negotiations over a stadium lease of a professional football league's potential monopoly power and its use of that power to extort one-sided stadium leases.
|
|||||
| Saltire Industrial, Inc. v. Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, PLLC, No. 06-5949,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, June 19, 2007, Decided , June 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly dismissed corporation's common law fraud claim against law firm, which arose out of law firm's alleged secret agreement with non-diverse codefendant to deprive corporation of 28 U.S.C.S. § 1332 jurisdiction in underlying toxic-tort action; law firm had no duty under Tennessee law to disclose alleged agreement to corporation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
