 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd., Nos. 06-2218, 06-2317,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Photo ID required by Ind. Code §§ 3-5-2-40.5, 3-10-1-7.2, 3-11-8-25.1, was not an undue burden on the right to vote because the statute's role in preventing voting fraud, specifically where a person came to polls claiming to be someone else, outweighed the effect of requiring a photo ID in inducing eligible voters to disfranchise themselves.
|
|||||
| Doumbia v. Gonzales, No. 05-4683,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review was denied where his unsubstantiated generalizations without more were not enough to question the reliability of evidence--especially official U.S. government reports; and IJ's conclusion that alien's documents were phony provided a clear basis for not setting aside IJ's finding that alien was not a credible witness.
|
|||||
| Farzana K. v. Ind. Dep't of Educ., No. 06-1632,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Complaint under the IDEA challenging a state administrative action was filed within the time limit under Ind. Code § 4-21.5-5-5 even though the complaint was rejected by an e-filing system for using the docket number of a dismissed suit; an e-filing system could not reject a document that a clerk would have to accept under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(e).
|
|||||
| United States v. Melendez, No. 03-1659,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ali v. Achim, No. 05-1194, Nos. 05-2028 & 05-3009,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Boyer v. Belavilas, No. 05-2764,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the mother exercised dominion over all of the money, despite both the creditors' rights and those of the children under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, her actions were enough to incur liability under the "benefit" clause of 11 U.S.C.S. § 550(a)(1).
|
|||||
| Crenshaw v. Antokol, No. 06-2046,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Northcutt v. GM Hourly-Rate Emples. Pension Plan, No. 05-4484,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vision Church v. Vill. of Long Grove, Nos. 04-4144 & 05-4234,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
