 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Comerica Bank v. Esposito, No. 06-1313,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action for breach of guarantee, the entry of default judgment against defendants was vacated because the district court abused its discretion; plaintiff did not assert that the requested extension would have impacted the case and plaintiff did not challenge defendants' good faith or that their attorney died and his firm neglected the case.
|
|||||
| DeWilliams v. Martinez, No. 06-2305,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Humphries v. CBOCS West, Inc., No. 05-4047,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment should not have been granted to an employer regarding a retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1981 because the African American employee who filed the action did meet his prima facie burden of showing a similarly situated comparator in a Caucasian employee who held the same position and had engaged in similar actions.
|
|||||
| Mabasa v. Gonzales, No. 04-4144,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sallenger v. Oakes, No. 05-3470,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officers were not entitled to qualified immunity on § 1983 excessive force claim because reasonable officer would have known that administering closed-fist punches and flashlight blows after arrestee was handcuffed and failing to properly position him after hobbling him violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force.
|
|||||
| Sissom v. Purdue Univ., No. 06-2273,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Lunsford, No. 06-2751,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in assessing defendant a five-level enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2G2.2 because defendant's earlier conviction on two counts of aggravated sexual abuse of minors constituted a pattern of activity involving the sexual abuse or exploitation of a minor.
|
|||||
| United States v. Stitman, No. 05-2277,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 70-month sentence for his 18 U.S.C.S. § 2113(a) bank robbery conviction was affirmed because dangerous weapon enhancement under USSG § 2B3.1(b)(2)(E) applied as defendant's behavior in creating bulge in pocket with his hand and informing teller that he had gun would lead objective observer to believe that he possessed weapon.
|
|||||
| Vision Church v. Vill. of Long Grove, Nos. 05-4144 & 05-4234,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
