 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ahmeti v. Gonzales, No. 04-2522,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review was denied. Record evidence supported IJ's finding that alien had failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. Harassment and beatings did not rise to level of persecution. Change in country conditions in Albania, along with other evidence, undermined alien's claim that he had a reasonable fear of future persecution.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. Milwaukee County, No. 05-1267,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Passenger who wished to hand out religious literature on buses failed to show that a bus system tariff prohibiting distribution of literature violated the First Amendment; the tariff was not vague or overbroad, the tariff was a reasonable restriction within a nonpublic forum, and the passenger did not establish discriminatory enforcement.
|
|||||
| Easley v. Frey, No. 04-1614,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate convicted of first degree murder was properly denied habeas corpus relief. His Fifth Amendment rights were not violated by a statement he made after invoking his right to remain silent since the statement was made in response to a correctional officer's comment regarding the evidence and consequences, which did not constitute interrogation.
|
|||||
| Farfaras v. Citizens Bank & Trust, Nos. 05-2082 & 05-2368,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of comments concerning a former employee's ancestry were properly admitted at trial on the employee's Title VII sexual harassment and tort claims, as the comments were intertwined with sexual harassment. The district court did not err in finding that a damages mitigation issue was not raised under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(b).
|
|||||
| Moss v. Ameritech Servs., Inc., No. 05-1270,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for employer was affirmed in African-American employee's discrimination action where she failed to specifically identify any similarly situated employee who was white, male, significantly younger, not disabled, or who had not filed prior discrimination complaints and was not terminated during the reduction in force.
|
|||||
| United States v. Abdalla, No. 04-3860,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal was dismissed because plea agreement contained appeal waiver, and counsel represented that defendant did not want to revoke his guilty plea, so any attempt to invalidate waiver would be frivolous, and counsel was not ineffective in failing to argue safety-valve sentence reduction because defendant was not eligible for same.
|
|||||
| United States v. Laufle, No. 04-3978,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant did not rebut a presumption that his sentence was reasonable because the district court, consistent with 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors, imposed a sentence within the guidelines range based on his insufficient assistance and his willing involvement in trafficking a substantial amount of marijuana over a lengthy time period.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rosas, No. 04-2929,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Stokes, No. 04-2730,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
