LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 11, 2007

  
Gomes v. Gonzales, Nos. 03-3020 & 04-1018, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Aliens' petition for review of denial of asylum was granted pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) because evidence supported aliens' claims that harassment and physical attacks upon them and family members by Muslim fundamentalists were religiously motivated and established past persecution under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1101(a)(42)(A), 1158(b)(1)(A).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Issakh v. Gonzales, No. 05-4636, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: BIA properly denied alien's motion to reopen asylum claim based on changed country conditions pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii) because evidence accompanying alien's motion was previously available and evidence failed to establish change in country conditions in Chad but merely repeated alien's original asylum claim of persecution.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mema v. Gonzales, No. 05-2570, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of an alien's asylum claim was remanded, as an IJ failed to consider whether the alien's twin brother, who had been granted asylum, had a well-founded fear of future persecution under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1101(a)(42)(A) and 1158(b)(1)(B)(i); the alien claimed to have been beaten by Albanian police because he was mistaken for his brother.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Miller v. Ameritech Corp., No. 05-4009, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment granting summary judgment to an employer on ADA claims was affirmed; the employee did not specifically identify the major life activity in which he purported to be substantially limited and he failed to produce even sufficient circumstantial evidence to survive summary judgment under the direct method on the retaliation claim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Wilburn, No. 05-4073, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Pretrial suppression motion was properly denied. Police officers were not required to bring defendant to apartment following his arrest, and his live-in girlfriend could consent to search of apartment. Defendant's juvenile adjudication for armed robbery was properly considered as predicate offense for Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing purposes.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Valere v. Gonzales, No. 05-2968, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: BIA's application of its decision in another case and 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5) to find that a permanent resident was ineligible for relief from removal under former 8 U.S.C.S. § 1182(c) due to the "statutory counterpart" rule was not impermissibly retroactive; the statutory counterpart rule predated the resident's guilty plea to a removable offense.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.