 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Heard v. Sheahan, No. 04-3162,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jolly Group, Ltd. v. Medline Indus., Inc., Nos. 05-2021 & 05-2115,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed monetary sanctions on attorney under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1927. The district court was not limited to facts stated in sanction motion when determining whether or not to impose sanctions. Record supported district court's finding that reconsideration motion vexatiously multiplied the litigation.
|
|||||
| Medellin-Reyes v. Gonzales, No. 05-3031, No. 05-4438,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed alien's § 2241 petition that had been transferred to the court for review under Real ID Act of 2005 because § 242(d)(1) of INA permitted petition for review only after BIA had rendered decision, but alien never sought review by BIA, and nothing in Real ID Act or § 242 of INA authorized it to review IJ's decisions.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. United States, No. 04-4034,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shtaro v. Gonzales, No. 04-4201,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision denying asylum based on a finding that the alien's testimony was not credible was not supported by substantial evidence because the Immigration Judge failed to point to any basis in the record for his skepticism about the alien's story that she was beaten and raped after she refused to participate in election fraud.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lewis, No. 04-4171,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly sentenced to 87 months' imprisonment on a guilty plea to attempting to possess and distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1); reliable evidence supported a finding that defendant was responsible for more than the stipulated amount of drugs, and the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors were considered.
|
|||||
| Van Patten v. Deppisch, No. 04-1276,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an inmate accepted a no contest plea to a first degree reckless homicide charge, but was represented by counsel only over a speakerphone at the plea hearing, the counsel's lack of physical presence at the plea hearing was a structural defect that pervaded the entire proceeding and violated the inmate's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
