 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Castillo v. Manzo, No. 06-1337,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in entering summary judgment for two prison employees in inmate's § 1983 suit, which asserted Title VII employment discrimination claim. District court erred in ignoring almost all of inmate's evidence. Inmate established prima facie Title VII case. Evidence did not support reason proffered for inmate's firing from prison job.
|
|||||
| Dzelili v. Gonzales, No. 06-1640,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported an IJ's finding that an alien who sought asylum failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution as required under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42)(A); the alien did not show that his refusal to join a rebel organization was based on a political opinion or that he was sought for military service because of his ethnicity.
|
|||||
| Malone v. Am. Friends Serv. Comm., No. 06-2736,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment to the employer on the employees' 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 1981 and 1986 claims was affirmed because the employees were not meeting the employer's legitimate business expectations as evidenced by the investigation's findings that the employees had permitted one of the employer's programs to be co-opted by another organization.
|
|||||
| Humphries v. CBOCS West, Inc., No. 05-4047,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Oshana v. Coca-Cola Co., No. 05-3640,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Ross, No. 06-1821,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not plainly err by imposing sex offender assessment and treatment as special condition of defendant's supervised release under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(d) because although offense of conviction, making false statements to FBI, was not sexual in nature, he falsely claimed he buried murdered child and was involved with child sex ring.
|
|||||
| Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. Sud's of Peoria, Inc., No. 05-3276,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to stay, under 9 U.S.C.S. § 3, all proceedings in a breach case pending arbitration because, while the parties' construction agreement included an arbitration clause, its loan agreement did not and the loan agreement contained a condition not dependent on the construction agreement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
