 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Howell v. Bezy, No. 05-2438,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for relief from dismissal of § 2241 petition, claiming his narcotics conviction sentence violated double jeopardy, was properly denied because inmate was not subjected to judicial order of forfeiture, so jeopardy did not attach when DEA seized his car, but rather when government brought criminal charges.
|
|||||
| Reliance Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., Nos. 04-4120 and 04-4148,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Saladino v. Envirovac, Inc., No. 04-3897,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that employee was discharged day after she requested accommodation of her disability was insufficient to avoid summary judgment on her ADA claim; employee's circumstantial evidence did not show that employer's seniority-based RIF policy was discriminatory, so employer's reliance on that policy precluded employee's discrimination claim.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jackson, No. 05-2768,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Paul, No. 05-2740,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's Anders motion to withdraw was granted and the appeal was dismissed because challenges to defendant's guilty plea, whether the district court should have suppressed evidence, and the reasonableness of defendant's sentence did not present nonfrivolous appeal issues.
|
|||||
| United States v. Sandoval-Vasquez, No. 03-1238,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officers entry into defendant's business during its normal business hours, even with guns drawn, did not violate the Fourth Amendment, defendant's consent to search a van on the premises was valid and not coerced, but Paladino remand was required to determine if same sentence would have been imposed under advisory sentencing guidelines.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
