 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abbott Labs. v. Takeda Pharm. Co., No. 06-1835,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this action for breach of a fiduciary duty, the judgment dismissing the suit was affirmed because there was no contention that plaintiff was coerced or deceived into agreeing to the clause as plaintiff proposed it to defendant and a claim of breach of contract arose from the contract and from the parties' conduct relating to the alleged breach.
|
|||||
| Apouviepseakoda v. Gonzales, No. 05-3752,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien was not denied reasonable opportunity to present evidence supporting her application under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229a(b)(4) and 8 C.F.R. § 1240.1(c) because although she complained that IJ asked majority of questions at hearing, IJ's actions did not deprive hearing of fairness as they were designed to focus hearing and exclude irrelevant evidence.
|
|||||
| Camico Mut. Ins. Co. v. Citizens Bank, No. 06-2346,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Accounting firm was properly granted summary judgment on bank's accounting malpractice cross-claim against firm on ground that cross-claim was untimely because terms of tolling agreement between bank and firm were unambiguous, and only statute of limitations defenses and other defenses were tolled, not running of limitations period.
|
|||||
| United States v. Garcia, No. 06-2741,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment convicting defendant of crimes relating to the manufacture of methamphetamine was affirmed because evidence obtained as a result of a tracking device attached to defendant's car should not have been suppressed as the fruit of an unconstitutional search; the device did not "seize" the car in any intelligible sense of the word.
|
|||||
| White v. HUD, No. 05-1252,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reversed the ALJ's decision as to petitioner's 42 U.S.C.S. § 3604(c) claim because immediately after learning that petitioner was an unmarried mother of two small children, the property owner told petitioner she would not rent to her. The property owner possessed no information whatsoever about petitioner's income or assets.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
