 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Davis v. Ben-Yisrayl, No. 03-3169,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Harden v. Kingston, No. 04-3520,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate was not entitled to habeas relief under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 as he could not show his counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress an identification. Counsel's choice to argue to the jury, rather than the judge, that burglary victim's identification was unreliable fell did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness.
|
|||||
| Ponomareva v. Gonzales, No. 03-2488,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rising-Moore v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., No. 05-1976,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a slip-and-fall case, the amount in controversy was sufficient for federal court jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1332 where the medical expenses and lost income alone totalled at least $45,000 and the injured party, a high income earner, also alleged permanent injuries, pain, suffering and future losses.
|
|||||
| United States v. Belk, No. 05-2711,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly sentenced to 51 months' imprisonment plus restitution for his mail fraud conviction under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1341 because district court properly applied Booker, preponderance of evidence demonstrated loss under USSG § 2B1.1(b) exceeded $ 40,000, and sentence fell within properly calculated range for such loss.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
