 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Hawkins, No. 05-4218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 151-month sentence for assaulting federal law enforcement officer was affirmed because defendant was not entitled to have jury determine whether he was career offender for USSG purposes, and further, case involved USSG (not statutory recidivist enhancement, and USSG calculations were governed by remedial opinion in Booker.
|
|||||
| United States v. Romero-Pedroza, No. 04-2475,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's properly-calculated guideline sentence was affirmed after district court replied on limited Paladino remand that it would have imposed same sentence under advisory guidelines because sentence was presumptively reasonable and defendant failed to rebut that presumption.
|
|||||
| EEOC v. Sidley Austin LLP, No. 06-8002,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: EEOC could obtain monetary relief on behalf of ex-partners of partnership who, having failed to file timely administrative charges under the ADEA, were barred from bringing their own suits; EEOC was not bound by ex-partners' failure to exhaust.
|
|||||
| Muzumdar v. Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd., No. 05-2636, Nos. 05-2686 & 05-2827,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: What a seller's rules and regulations provided was a nonexclusive jurisdictional provision, requiring its associates and distributors to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the Texas courts. This did not negate the mandatory forum selection clause in the agreement between the parties and the district court was affirmed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Baker, No. 04-4344,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions of being a felon in possession of a firearm were affirmed where exclusion of the presentation of the entrapment by estoppel and public authority defenses, as well as the statutory defense in 18 U.S.C.S. § 925(a), was not error, and the court properly refused to give the jury instruction for the public authority defense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
