 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Soy, No. 03-3438, No. 04-1218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's sentence because district court's sentence of 528 months for defendant was properly calculated under United States Sentencing Guidelines and defendant had not pointed to any factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) that called into question propriety of district court's sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Stark, No. 05-1644,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Government sufficiently complied with 21 U.S.C.S. § 851(a)(1) because it filed and served information on day of plea hearing before it began; district court's failure to afford defendant opportunity to deny previous conviction under § 851(b) was harmless error because he was aware of likely enhancement from pre-sentence investigation report.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
