 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mohammad v. United States, No. 04-4080,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Suit challenging the DEA's seizure of certain property should not have been dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the district court had jurisdiction to determine whether the notice to the property owner was adequate in light of her allegations that she was misled by a government attorney to believe her suit was an appropriate challenge.
|
|||||
| Nguyen v. United States, No. 05-3398,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Silvernail v. Ameritech Pension Plan, No. 05-1535,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly dismissed a former employee's ERISA claim after determining that he did not meet pension plan's vesting requirements. Because plan, which was 10-year cliff vesting plan, met former § 203(a)(2)(A) of ERISA requirements, pursuant to former § 203(b)(1)(A) of ERISA the plan could disregard employee's service before he turned 22.
|
|||||
| Tourdot v. Rockford Health Plans, Inc., No. 05-1764,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of insurer in a coverage dispute was proper. The insured committed an illegal act when he drove his motorcycle while under the influence of alcohol and as a result, the insurer properly denied coverage under an "illegal acts" exclusion for the injuries the insured sustained when he crashed his motorcycle.
|
|||||
| United States v. Alburay, No. 05-3905,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Belk, No. 05-2711,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Pena, No. 04-1854,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Pena, No. 04-1854,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Salazar-Hernandez, No. 04-2386,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, February 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
