 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cent. States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Phencorp Reinsurance Co., No. 05-2058,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court erred by dismissing an action for lack of personal jurisdiction over a Barbados company, but apparently based its holding on a finding of a lack of specific jurisdiction and did not address whether the company had sufficient minimum contacts for general personal jurisdiction; discovery should have been permitted on this issue.
|
|||||
| Haywood v. United States, No. 05-3842,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lindell v. Govier, No. 05-2772,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Cotton, No. 05-3908,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from the revocation of his supervised release was dismissed as frivolous because the district court could have inferred his possession of cocaine, a violation of the conditions of release, from the uncontested, positive results of a urinalysis.
|
|||||
| United States v. McCray, No. 05-4194,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Argument that sentence on conspiracy count (and by implication, other counts) violated Fifth Amendment right to indictment by grand jury because prior conviction used to increase statutory minimum was not alleged in indictment failed under US Supreme Court precedent. Viability of precedent was not for court of appeals to decide.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
