 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gillespie v. Trans Union Corp., No. 06-2576,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered for consumer reporting agency in consumers' FCRA suit. Agency did not violate 15 U.S.C.S. § 1681g(a)(1) by failing to disclose "purge dates" attached to negative information in consumers' files. "File," as used in § 1681g(a)(1), encompassed only information that agency disclosed to third parties from the files.
|
|||||
| Sharashidze v. Gonzales, No. 06-2661,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Asylee's conviction for indecent solicitation of sex act, in violation of 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11-14.1, constituted an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) when the complaint indicated that the victim was a minor, and asylee failed to exhaust his due process claim, precluding judicial review under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(d)(1).
|
|||||
| United States v. Gibson, No. 05-4327,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly reinstated conspiracy to commit money laundering and mail and wire fraud charges under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 1956(h), 1341, 1343, after defendant's guilty plea was vacated. 18 U.S.C.S. § 3290 applied to toll the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3282 five year limitations period, and original charges could be reinstated pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S. § 3296.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wilson, Nos. 04-1594, 04-1595, 04-1763, 04-1999 & 05-2668,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a drug conspiracy case, the government's failure to disclose evidence that could have been used to impeach a government witness did not require a new trial given that substantial evidence corroborated the witness's testimony. Two defendants were entitled to a limited remand to review their sentences under the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
|
|||||
| Baptist v. City of Kankakee, No. 05-4034,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court's judgment denying the employees' motion to vacate the agreed judgment order was affirmed because the employees were represented by independent counsel when they agreed to settle their Title VII claims and the employees unquestionably received value in exchange for the settlement of their claims.
|
|||||
| Fairley v. Fermaint, No. 06-2411,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gibson, No. 05-4327,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Williams Elecs. Games, Inc. v. Garrity, Nos. 05-4006, 05-4010,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' remanded state law fraud claim. Although presumption in favor of dismissing fraud claim under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1367(c)(3) did not apply because several federal claims went to trial, fraud claim was properly dismissed under § 1367(c)(1).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
