 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brewer v. Bd. of Trs. , No. 06-1259,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the university on the student's Titles VI and VII claims was affirmed because the student provided no suspicious context from which a reasonable jury could conclude that the neutral or positive references to race in fact masked negative racial attitudes.
|
|||||
| Christensen v. County of Boone, No. 04-4162,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dating couple allegedly stalked by county sheriff's deputy did not state a claim for violation of their Fourth Amendment or due process rights because the sheriff's conduct, which occurred in public places, did not constitute either a search or seizure and, while perhaps tortious in nature, was not so egregious to implicate the Due Process Clause.
|
|||||
| Duncan v. Fapso, No. 06-1744,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| EEOC v. Schneider Nat'l, Inc., No. 06-3108,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly granted summary judgment to employer in EEOC enforcement suit. Fact that employer fired truck driver, who had "neurocardiogenic syncope" condition, because he failed to meet employer's safety standards did not prove that employer regarded driver as being disabled under 42 U.S.C.S. § 12102(2)(C). No violation of ADA occurred.
|
|||||
| Hong v. Sims, No. 06-3333,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The judgment rejecting petitioner's argument in his 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 action was affirmed; because defendant's sentence for each offense was well under the maximum, the decision of the Illinois appellate court was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of Apprendi.
|
|||||
| Krieg v. Seybold, No. 06-2322,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City's drug testing policy did not violate employee's Fourth Amendment rights because special governmental need existed due to fact that employee performed safety sensitive job as he regularly operated large vehicles and equipment, which presented substantial risk of injury to others if operated by employee under influence of drugs or alcohol.
|
|||||
| Pruitt v. Mote, No. 05-1620,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Raygoza v. Randolph, No. 05-2340,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Republic Tobacco Co. v. N. Atl. Trading Co., No. 05-3634,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
