 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Galicia-Cardenas, No. 05-3093, No. 05-3486,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The government was entitled to the resentencing of defendant A, who had a higher guideline range but was given a lower sentence than defendant B for illegal reentry, without a credit for Wisconsin's lack of a fast-track program because the appellate court could not say that the downward departure was reasonable based on the lack of such program.
|
|||||
| United States v. Grigg, No. 05-2484,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court appeared to treat 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(b)(2) as prohibiting discretionary sentences outside of the Sentencing Guidelines range in a child pornography case, and may have committed plain error because § 3553(b)(2) violated the Sixth Amendment by mandating a sentence within the Sentencing Guidelines range.
|
|||||
| United States v. Poole, No. 05-4019,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal was dismissed because any error in adjusting his sentence upward for the commission of multiple robberies had no impact on his sentence where defendant's statutory maximum sentence was his guidelines sentence for conspiracy to commit bank robbery.
|
|||||
| United States v. Reyes-Acosta, No. 05-2785,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's motion to withdraw was granted because there were no nonfrivolous issues to appeal following defendant's guilty plea to violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) and the sentence imposed by the district court. The appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
