 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. Barnhart, No. 05-1689,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court found that substantial evidence supported the administrative law judge's conclusion that despite the claimant's educational and physical limitations she was not disabled and is capable of working as a hotel maid as that job was customarily performed in the national economy.
|
|||||
| Boyd v. Barnhart, No. 05-1813,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court improperly denied claimant's request for attorney's fees in his Social Security case under Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.S. § 2412, because ALJ's credibility determination was not sufficiently specific under S.S.R. 96-7p to enable meaningful appellate review, and reasons for credibility finding were not specified.
|
|||||
| In re Watson, No. 06-1134,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martin v. Vannatta, No. 04-4085,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly dismissed inmate's habeas petition, challenging disciplinary conviction, because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies, he failed to show cause for procedural default as he failed to show why weekly allocation of free stamps was insufficient to mail appeal, and he failed to show he was actually innocent of charges.
|
|||||
| Murry v. Barnes, No. 05-3622,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Patel v. Gonzales, Nos. 04-3401, 04-4159, 05-1687,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion by finding aliens' motions to reopen their asylum cases to be untimely and not subject to equitable tolling because there was evidence that the aliens knew that their cases had been denied when another family member made inquiries, but failed to move to reopen until some two years later.
|
|||||
| United States v. Andrews, No. 05-1974,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A reasonable officer observing what was likely money burning on a grill, would have had probable cause to believe evidence would be destroyed before a warrant could be obtained if the officers on the scene did not intervene; district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress.
|
|||||
| United States v. Davis, No. 05-2489,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's enhancement for obstruction of justice under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 was proper because defendant's attempt to influence witnesses to make false statements to investigating authorities qualified as an obstruction of justice under § 3C1.1.
|
|||||
| United States v. Warner, No. 05-2770,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, March 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from sentence imposed after he was found to be career offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1 was dismissed as frivolous because application of § 4B1.1 was not departure and did not require notice; Sixth Amendment was not violated as defendant waived right to have jury resolve factual disputes by pleading guilty.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
