 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adkins v. Astrue, No. 06-1476,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of an application for benefits under the Social Security Act was affirmed because the claimant's IQ test scores were inconsistent with other evidence of his cognitive stability and the claimant failed to demonstrate significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning nor deficits in his adaptive functioning prior to age twenty-two.
|
|||||
| Bombaci v. Journal Cmty. Publ'g Group, Inc., No. 06-2222,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the employee's Title VII sexual harassment claim was reversed because a manager allegedly passed off the important reporting responsibility to a lower-level worker with no authority to remedy sexual harassment, and did not speak with the employee to make sure that the problem was being addressed.
|
|||||
| Farmers Auto. Ins. Ass'n v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., No. 06-2810,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer was properly granted summary judgment in employer's wrongful denial of benefits suit. Exclusion in employment practices liability policy, which excluded coverage for violations of Fair Labor Standards Act and "similar" state provisions, clearly applied to class action claims brought against the employer under 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 105/4a(1).
|
|||||
| Gwin v. Am. River Transp. Co., No. 06-2900,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly entered judgment for fired tow-boat operator on his 46 U.S.C.S. § 2114(a)(1)(B) wrongful termination claim. Evidence showed that employer had implicitly ordered operator to perform duties that operator believed were unsafe. Section 2114(b) superseded Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Employer's claims for costs should be reconsidered.
|
|||||
| Jacobs v. Frank, No. 06-3478,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Twitty v. McCoskey, No. 06-1675,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Palivos, Nos. 05-4258 & 05-4329,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant attorney, who was convicted of conspiracy to obstruct justice, failed to show that the government misled a witness into testifying against the attorney in connection with a loan fraud scheme. However, defendant loan broker was improperly convicted under 26 U.S.C.S. § 7206(2), as it was not shown that a false tax return had been filed.
|
|||||
| Whitener v. Finnan, No. 06-2888,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
