 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Heath v. City of Harvey, No. 05-4147,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owners, in a conspiracy and retaliation suit against a city and former officials, waived an argument that the district court should have sua sponte stayed a summary judgment ruling while a motion to disqualify the owners' counsel was pending; the owners failed to cite legal authority and failed to timely raise the argument.
|
|||||
| Hoosier Care, Inc. v. Chertoff, No. 06-3562,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In rejecting residential care facility's petition to classify two aliens as eligible for "employer-based" immigration pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1153(b)(3)(A)(i), 1182(a)(5)(A)(i), DHS improperly inquired into training requirements for positions sought to be filled, which was a matter for the Department of Labor, so action was returned to DHS .
|
|||||
| United States v. Kurschner, No. 06-3985,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appointed counsel was permitted to withdraw from defendant's appeal of his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 2314 because there was not a nonfrivolous basis for appeal. For example, defendant's objection to the loss amount used for sentencing was waived because he withdrew his objection at sentencing.
|
|||||
| Young v. United States, No. 06-2591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ray v. Citigroup Global Mkts., No. 05-4362,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered against investors as to their S.E.C. Rule 10b-5 and 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a), claims. Genuine factual dispute did not exist as to loss causation, which was required element of investors' claims. The investors did not present evidence linking advisor's alleged misrepresentations with stock's drop in value.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. Hulick, No. 06-3655,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fonseca-Sanchez v. Gonzales, No. 06-2387,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Federal appellate court lacked jurisdiction over an alien's petition for review of an administrative denial of her petition for interim "U" visa relief because she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. Moreover, there was no basis in 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252 for the court to exercise jurisdiction over the denial of the interim "U" visa petition.
|
|||||
| Graham v. Borgen, No. 04-4103,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of an inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was affirmed because the inmate's petition was not timely filed; the inmate waited almost twelve years after sentencing and then filed a motion to modify his sentence pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06, entitled "Postconviction procedure."
|
|||||
| United States v. Doxy, Nos. 06-1659 & 06-2931,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police search of defendants and their car did not violate the Fourth Amendment because police were conducting a valid investigative stop and, while the initial purpose for the stop had concluded, an officer's detection of a marijuana smell was enough to justify resuming the stop; the court had no reason to doubt the officer's credibility.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
