 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dahler v. United States, No. 05-4782,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Giles v. Astrue, No. 06-2293,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: ALJ did not adequately explain a decision that a former recipient of Social Security childhood disability benefits was no longer eligible for benefits under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1382c(a)(3)(C)(i); the ALJ did not explain why evidence concerning the recipient's attention and concentration difficulties did not result in a finding of a marked limitation.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Gonzales, No. 03-3671,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Administrative decision denying an alien's claim for asylum and other relief was vacated because the IJ erred by failing to consider the legitimacy of the alien's conviction when he found him ineligible under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(ii), and, without explanation, disregarded evidence supporting the alien's fears about returning to his country.
|
|||||
| Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co. v. Bridge, No. 06-1160,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schmidt v. Canadian Nat'l Ry. Corp., No. 06-1846,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Barren, No. 05-3949,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Harvey, No. 05-2897,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indictment that charged defendant with violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c)(1) by carrying a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime was not so defective as to require reversal; although the indictment combined phrases from different parts of § 924(c)(1), the phrases were close enough in meaning that defendant knew the essence of the charge.
|
|||||
| United States v. Singh, Nos. 05-4509 & 05-4575,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury was properly instructed in a prosecution involving the Federal Kidnapping Act because the jury was told that, under the Act, the transportation of a victim begins when he is willfully moved from the place of abduction. The Act applied here because there was sufficient evidence that the victim was alive at the time of transportation.
|
|||||
| United States v. Tedder, No. 05-4448,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
