LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - April 10 - April 11, 2006

  
Scheerer v. Potter, No. 05-2338, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: USPS was entitled to summary judgment on diabetic employee's 29 U.S.C.S. § 794 claim. Predominant purpose of dietary restrictions was to lose weight, not to control rapid blood-sugar level fluctuations; also, type of sexual impairment employee raised--reduction in desire and erectile dysfunction--did not significantly limit capacity to reproduce.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lindell v. Govier, No. 05-2772, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Manicki v. Zeilmann, No. 05-1649, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: District court properly dismissed ex-police officer's § 1983 suit against police chief and city commissioners on finding that prior state court dismissal of officer's claims against chief was res judicata; because officer's theory of recovery was one of joint tort, final state court ruling that chief was not liable doomed § 1983 claim against both.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Norman v. City of Evanston, No. 04-2658, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The court affirmed the dismissal of a prisoner's § 1983 complaint because, even if the limitations period was tolled until the prisoner received a response to his "citizen's complaint," plaintiff's complaint still would have been filed after the two-years limitations period expired.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Alhalabi, Nos. 05-2209 & 05-2591, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant engaged in food stamp and wire fraud pursuant to 7 U.S.C.S. § 2024(b) and 18 U.S.C.S. § 1343 on the dates alleged in the indictment; the indictment crafted by the government was sufficient. Because the district court properly ruled on the various challenges to the indictment and evidentiary issues, the appellate court affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Thomas, No. 04-2553, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wheeler v. Barnhart, No. 05-3316, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of disability insurance benefits was affirmed. The ALJ permissibly discounted treating physician's opinion that claimant suffered from severe physical limitations that prevented her from working in a sustained setting as it was not supported by clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques and was inconsistent with other medical evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.