 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jenkins v. Bartlett, No. 06-2495,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City and police chief were properly granted summary judgment as to Monell failure to supervise/train claim asserted in § 1983 suit because jury found police officer's use of deadly force did not violate decedent's U.S. Const. amend IV rights. District court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony. A privilege ruling was correct.
|
|||||
| Juarez-Lopez v. Gonzales, No. 06-3143,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b), an IJ's decision denying an application for asylum had to be vacated and remanded because the IJ's adverse credibility finding was not supported by substantial evidence; it was instead based on the IJ's mere speculation that the alien's claim of being repeatedly raped in Guatemala was a recent fabrication.
|
|||||
| Lopez-Monterroso v. Gonzales, No. 06-3716,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien who claimed that he had been beaten by gangs in Guatemala did not establish persecution on account of religion or membership in a social group as required under 8 U.S.C.S. §§ 1158(b)(1)(B)(i) and 1101(a)(42)(A) in order to be eligible for asylum; there was no evidence that the government was unwilling to protect the alien.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
