 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hower v. Molding Sys. Eng'g Corp., No. 05-1889,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where no stay was entered, the bankruptcy court made an explicit finding of good faith, and the disputed sale had already taken place, 11 U.S.C.S. § 363(m) provided that the sale was valid, and the denial of creditor's motion to stay the sale of debtor's assets was affirmed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Eskridge, No. 05-2808,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judge could not impose consecutive 10-month terms of imprisonment after defendant again violated the terms of his supervised release because the court's supervised release exceeded term 24 months; the judgment was vacated and the case remanded for resentencing.
|
|||||
| United States v. Martins, No. 04-3350,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where testimony placed defendant in heroin distribution centers and wiretaps showed that coconspirator relayed at least one order for heroin to defendant to be filled, it would have been frivolous to argue on appeal that no rational jury could have found defendant guilty of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| United States v. Rodriguez-Olguin, No. 05-2775,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Salgado, No. 05-4095,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Yemi Odulate, No. 04-4130,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction on narcotics-related offenses was affirmed because a reasonable juror could have found that defendant was part of a single conspiracy with the shared goal of distributing heroin under 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), there was no error in denying his motions for a new trial, and exculpatory evidence was not withheld.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
