 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bennett v. Southwest Airlines Co., No. 06-3486,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: For purposes of removing an aviation accident case from state court to federal court under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1441, the case did not arise under federal law simply due to the existence of federal aviation standards. Because the case involved a fact-specific application of rules stemming from both federal and state law, it was subject to remand.
|
|||||
| Lockheart v. Drapiewski, No. 05-2816,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officers were entitled to summary judgment in an arrestee's § 1983 action alleging a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim when the arrestee provided no evidence to support his claim or to rebut the officers' statements that they used only reasonable force during the arrest and did not assault the arrestee while he was in their custody.
|
|||||
| United States v. Pulley, No. 06-3337,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from her guilty plea conviction and sentence for distributing crack cocaine, a violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1), was dismissed and counsel was granted leave to withdraw because district court engaged in a thorough Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 colloquy with defendant and defendant's below-guidelines sentence was not unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Robinson, No. 06-2512,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence was sufficient for a defendant's conviction under 21 U.S.C.S. § 846 because the defendant and his supplier had an extensive relationship, as evidenced by a pen register capture of over 800 phone calls between the two during the period in question, and the defendant regularly purchased amounts of cocaine larger than for personal use.
|
|||||
| Afi M. Apouviepseakoda v. Gonzales, No. 05-3752,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Novak v. Nicholson, No. 06-3180,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the employee's Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title VII claims was affirmed because the employee had not presented any evidence that a vacant position existed for which he was qualified and the employee failed to present evidence of conduct sufficiently severe to constitute a constructive discharge.
|
|||||
| United States v. Krueger, No. 06-3406,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Morris, No. 06-3481,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court improperly granted defendant's motion to suppress because officers sought and obtained search warrant from state court judge, creating presumption that they acted in good faith, and defendant failed to overcome presumption of good faith, so even if probable cause did not support search warrant, evidence was nonetheless admissible.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
