 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Davis v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., Nos. 05-2001 & 05-2165,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Davit v. Davit, No. 05-1061,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Palmer v. United States, No. 05-4758,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Ward, No. 05-3973,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied defendant's 18 U.S.C.S. § 3582 motion for reduction of sentence because Amendment 599 would not have affected defendant's theoretical guidelines range as underlying offense for purposes of 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c) was armed robbery and offense level for armed robbery did not include guidelines enhancement.
|
|||||
| Chi. United Indus. v. City of Chi., No. 05-4092,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appellate court had jurisdiction over a city's appeal of a TRO because the TRO was modified without the city's consent and 20 days had expired, transforming the TRO into an appealable preliminary injunction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1292(a)(1). Injunctive relief was moot however due to rescinding actions taken by the city.
|
|||||
| Serino v. Potter, No. 04-2783,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Disabled employee's transfer - without more, such as a reduction in pay or significantly diminished working conditions - fell below the level of an adverse employment action necessary to support a claim of discrimination or retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.S. § 701 et seq.
|
|||||
| United States v. Stoneking, No. 05-2609,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officer was told that defendant had been seen inside a suspected meth lab and detained defendant in order to protect the status quo until defendant's role in the meth lab being searched could be ascertained; the officer had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant, and the evidence obtained after the detention was not the fruit of a poisonous tree.
|
|||||
| Williams-Bey v. Buss, No. 06-1138,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Zhao v. Gonzales, No. 05-2733,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA properly denied Chinese alien's request for withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1231(b)(3)(A) because to extent alien was claiming persecution based on his boss's Falun Gong activities, alien failed to show that the officials who interrogated and assaulted him were motivated by a belief that he was a Falun Gong practitioner.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
