 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Sys., No. 05-4263,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly quashed subpoena issued by defendant in copyright infringement action filed in Ohio federal court that sought from third party any software sold or provided by plaintiff and any documents in third party's possession related to that software because third party's software was not relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1).
|
|||||
| Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Ill. Gaming Bd. (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.), No. 06-1984,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Noesen v. Medical Staffing Network, Inc., No. 06-2831,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered against pharmacist, who alleged that store corporation discriminated against him because of his religion. No violation of 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-2 occurred because requested religious accommodation would have caused undue hardship to corporation. State of Wisconsin was immune from suit under U.S. Const. amend. XI.
|
|||||
| Rljcs Enters. v. Prof'l Benefit Trust Multiple Emplr. Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust, No. 06-3408,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Participants in a death benefit plan structured as a trust were not entitled to proceeds from the trust's sale of insurance policies that it purchased to reinsure its risk. The policies belonged to the trust, not the participants, and the participants therefore had no entitlement under ERISA to collect proceeds attributable to any such policies.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ladd, No. 06-1009,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vill. of Rosemont v. Jaffee (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.), No. 05-4558,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Woods v. Buss, No. 07-1951,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Death row inmate was denied certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(2) to challenge dismissal of petition because it sought habeas relief and was unauthorized, successive petition that was barred by one-year statute of limitations, and inmate failed to make prima facie showing of mental retardation so as to prevent his execution.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
