 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Frank, No. 06-3582,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2007, Submitted , May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from within-guidelines 84 month sentence imposed for his 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a) drug distribution offense was dismissed. Offense level was properly calculated under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(c)(7) based upon drug quantity stipulation. A criminal history point could be assessed for a second sexual assault conviction.
|
|||||
| United States v. Pina-Gonzalez, No. 07-1058,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2007, Submitted , May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's counsel was granted leave to withdraw and his appeal was dismissed because defendant could not contest his appeal waiver without challenging his guilty plea, which he had not indicated that he wished to do, and any ineffective assistance of counsel claim was better suited to collateral attack when a full record could be developed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Roti, No. 06-3192,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was affirmed because the district court did not err in barring evidence of defendant's settlement agreement under Fed. R. Evid. 408 even though there was judicial precedent that R. 408 did not apply to criminal proceedings because district court also relied on Fed. R. Evid. 403 and it appeared that evidence was not relevant.
|
|||||
| Weiss v. Ind. Parole Bd., No. 06-3639,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2007 * , Submitted* After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)., May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former parolee's habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 that challenged the imposition of certain sex-offender parole conditions was determined to be moot because the parole, and its conditions, had concluded after the notice of appeal was filed and there were no remaining consequences of the custody or parole to be challenged.
|
|||||
| Woods v. Buss, No. 07-2001,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 3, 2007, Submitted , May 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Death row inmate was not entitled to an injunction or stay of execution on Eighth Amendment grounds because he failed to establish that Indiana's lethal injection method involved unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain. The individuals responsible for the execution were sufficiently trained and were governed by appropriate procedures.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
