 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Decatur Ventures, LLC v. Daniel, No. 06-3441,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case brought by a real estate investor who alleged he incurred losses as a result of a scheme that used inflated property appraisals, the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of a supervising appraiser because there was no evidence suggesting that she knew the numbers to be false and therefore could be liable for fraud.
|
|||||
| Gouveia v. RDI Group (In re Globe Bldg. Materials, Inc.), No. 05-4749,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bankruptcy trustee was entitled to recover a payment that a supplier had received from the debtor during the preference period just before filing for bankruptcy because, while the supplier delivered certain equipment to the debtor, the delivery was part of a pre-existing obligation and did not constitute "new value" under 11 U.S.C.S. § 547(c)(4).
|
|||||
| Gullone v. Bayer Corp. (In re Factor VIII or IX Concentrate Blood Products), No. 06-1427,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Record contained enough evidence to support the conclusion that citizens of the United Kingdom had a greater interest in the controversy than those of California; while the ruling on drug companies' motion for dismissal for forum non conveniens easily could have gone either way, district court did not abuse its discretion by granting the motion.
|
|||||
| Isaacs v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., No. 06-2201,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the Title VII hostile environment claim was reversed because a jury could infer that working conditions for female laborers were materially worse than the conditions for male laborers, that managers knew this, and that they did nothing because the firm deemed the men's morale more important.
|
|||||
| West v. Schneiter, No. 06-4359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253(c)(1) required a certificate of appealability for any appeal in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255; even if there were a constitutional question at issue, a certificate could not issue because the antecedent statutory questions about the period of limitations and the proper use of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) were not substantial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
