 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bolanowski v. GMRI, Inc., No. 05-2492,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs' personal injury action was properly dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) because district court's findings correctly showed that plaintiffs acted unreasonably by failing to respond to six discovery motions, three court orders to produce discovery, two court orders imposing sanctions, or letters from defendant requesting documents.
|
|||||
| Cevilla v. Gonzales, No. 05-2387,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied alien's petition for review of BIA's denial of her motion to reopen denial of alien's motion for cancellation of removal for failure to meet requirements of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229b(b)(1) based on new evidence concerning hardship because court lacked jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(a)(2)(D) to review factual questions.
|
|||||
| Fischer v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, No. 05-3391,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer's request that suit be dismissed if employee continued to disregard discovery deadlines, prior dismissal of suit for failure to prosecute, and employee's lame excuses at hearing were circumstances in light of which, given her dilatoriness, it could not be said that district court abused its discretion in dismissing suit without warning.
|
|||||
| Lakeview Tech., Inc. v. Robinson, No. 05-4433,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court improperly denied former employer's motion for preliminary injunction against former employee to ensure that he would not compete and hold in confidences employer's trade secrets because absence of proof that employee solicited employer's customers or disclosed its secrets was inadequate reason to deny relief.
|
|||||
| Simelton v. Frank, No. 05-2227,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied petitioner's § 2254 habeas petition, challenging state court guilty-plea conviction for sexual assault, because when petitioner pled guilty, he indicated he understood that victim's lack of consent was element of crime, so it was not unreasonable for state court to hold petitioner to admissions made at guilty plea.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
