 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roth, No. 06-3412,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Customer information in an insurance company's database satisfied the definition of trade secret under Wis. Stat. § 134.90(1)(c) and therefore the company, which was the principal for certain agents who were later terminated, was entitled to a preliminary injunction barring those agents from using trade secrets from the company's database.
|
|||||
| Courtney v. Halleran, Nos. 05-1244, 05-3500, 05-3642, 05-3651,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court correctly rejected the depositors request for declaratory and injunctive relief against several investors and the FDIC; the FDIC had the general power to settle with alleged wrongdoers under 12 U.S.C.S. § 1821(p)(3)(A), which must operate independently of § 1821(d)(11)(A) if it was to mean anything at all.
|
|||||
| Scruggs v. Jordan, No. 05-4238,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's due process rights were not violated when prison board denied him access to live witnesses, surveillance video, or prison medical records because board had accepted inmate's own version of events - that he hit another inmate with a cane in order to stop that inmate from stabbing a third inmate - and such evidence was merely repetitive.
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. McFarland, No. 06-3231,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to defendants on the employee's sex discrimination claims under Title VII and 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 was affirmed because defendants offered a legitimate, nondiscriminatory explanation for firing the employee; they asserted that she was fired because she failed in her duty to render aid to a fellow officer.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. City of Gary, No. 06-3550,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Minister's complaint alleging that city violated his rights under RLUIPA when it demolished church instead of giving it to him was properly dismissed under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(e)(2) because he failed to state claim as his complaint made clear that he did not have legally recognized property interest in church under 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000cc-5(5).
|
|||||
| Williams v. Bartow, No. 05-4736,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Swan, No. 06-1417,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Relying on FBI agent's testimony that attorney called him in response to subpoena, that he identified himself as associate of firm representing defendant's business, and that to best of agent's knowledge, attorney was representing defendant, agent's testimony was properly admitted as admission of party by agent under Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(D).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
