 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hamm v. Exxon Mobil Corp., No. 06-1692,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered against terminated employee as to his 42 U.S.C.S. § 12112(b)(5)(A) failure to accommodate claim because there was no triable issue of fact as to whether he was qualified individual with disability as defined in 42 U.S.C.S. § 12111(8). Employee was unable to work for extended periods because of his poor health.
|
|||||
| United States v. Loggins, No. 06-1535,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a robbery trial, the district court did not abuse its discretion in barring a statement from counsel for a co-defendant that indicated defendant was at the robbery but did not know what was about to happen. Fed. R. Evid. 804(b) did not support admission, nor was the statement so exculpatory or significant to trigger Sixth Amendment concerns.
|
|||||
| United States v. Martinez, No. 01-1949,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's life sentence, imposed for racketeering and drug conspiracy crimes, was affirmed following a limited Booker remand. District court stated that it would impose same sentence under advisory guidelines scheme. Sentence was reasonable. It was within guidelines range and was imposed after full consideration of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. Mendez, No. 01-1891,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's life sentence because even without applying presumption of reasonableness afforded to his guidelines sentence, sentence was reasonable given nature of his crimes, including brutal murder and several instances of witness tampering; his continued criminal activity in prison; his lack of remorse; and need for deterrence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Vasquez, No. 01-2065,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's life sentence because even without applying presumption of reasonableness afforded to his guidelines sentence, sentence was reasonable given nature of his crimes, including murders, shootings, murder attempts, and witness tampering; his continued criminal activity in prison; his lack of remorse; and need for deterrence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
