 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hoeft v. Wisher, No. 05-3410,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where prison complaint examiner determined that prisoner's transfer was not good cause to excuse his untimeliness under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1997e(a) because he could have filed prior to his transfer or immediately upon his return, prisoner's inadequate medical treatment claim under the Eighth Amendment was properly dismissed.
|
|||||
| McCarthy v. United States, No. 06-1354,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Peeler v. MCI, Inc., No. 01-3019,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's decision declining to enjoin communication company's installation and use of fiber-optic cable on parcel of land adjacent to property owner's land was affirmed because company had completed installation of cable and general discharge of original defendant in its bankruptcy proceeding extinguished owner's principal claims.
|
|||||
| Pozo v. Hein, No. 05-2208,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because prison employees introduced uncontested evidence that inmate was denied breakfast because he refused to comply with a prison rule requiring that he first remove clothing from his head so that guards could determine whether he had a weapon, employees' enforcement of this rule did not violate the Eighth Amendment.
|
|||||
| United States v. Alhalabi, Nos. 05-2209 & 05-2591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Mandel, No. 05-3473,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied defendant's motion to modify restitution order because defendant was not asking district court to modify pertinent condition of his supervised release under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(e)(2) but was seeking partial release of liability, and that relief was unavailable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Taylor, No. 05-3434,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's unlawful possession of a firearm case, the district court properly refused to suppress evidence found during a warrantless search; exigent circumstances and consent permitted the search. Defendant was properly sentenced as an armed career criminal; a theft from a person conviction was a "violent felony" under 18 U.S.C.S. § 924.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
