 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Merino v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., No. 06-3480,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly granted summary judgment in plaintiff's action arising out of a licensing agreement that granted defendant the exclusive right to manufacture and sell an unpatented device that plaintiff had developed because the undisputed facts showed that defendant had complied with all of its obligations under the agreement.
|
|||||
| Plummer v. Potter, No. 06-3039,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in a Title VII case in favor of employer was affirmed. District court correctly found that employees plaintiff identified were not similarly situated. Because she failed to establish a prima facie case, the district court was not obligated to consider pretext. Record suggested dishonesty was motivating factor for discipline.
|
|||||
| United States v. Duran, No. 06-2326,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Longoria, No. 06-2434,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Onkst, No. 06-4336,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel's motion to withdraw under Anders was granted because he was unable to discern a nonfrivolous issue to pursue and the court agreed. Among other things, regarding devising a scheme to defraud through bankruptcy, 18 U.S.C.S. § 157, as long as defendant made one fraudulent filing, the number of bankruptcy petitions he filed was irrelevant.
|
|||||
| Zahren v. Gonzales, No. 06-1301,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien described himself as Palestinian, but in light of his admission to the IJ that the allegation of Jordanian citizenship in the notice to appear was correct, and the absence of his passport from the record, appellate court had to accept the finding under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(b)(4)(B) that he was a Jordanian citizen.
|
|||||
| Harris v. Kuba, No. 05-3357,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pardoned prisoner was not entitled to relief in a 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 case where he alleged that police officers violated his due process rights by failing to disclose Brady materials, because the evidence, which included the prisoner's own alibi for a different crime in which he was not charged, was neither favorable nor suppressed.
|
|||||
| Hatch v. Briley, No. 05-3204,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, May 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
