 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| John M. Floyd & Assocs. v. Star Fin. Bank, No. 06-2428,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this breach of contract action, the grant of summary judgment to the bank was affirmed because the contract between the parties did not envision that the bank would pay for the consulting firm's ideas, but rather for action. There was clear language that the obligation to pay did not arise until after a change was installed.
|
|||||
| Petra Presbyterian Church v. Villiage of Northbrook, No. 06-1329,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Church did not reasonably rely on the invalidity under RLUIPA of a village's former zoning ordinance when it bought property in a zone that excluded churches, as a revised ordinance continued to exclude churches, along with other organizations. The revised ordinance did not impose a substantial burden on exercise of religious rights.
|
|||||
| United States v. Hagenow, No. 05-4443,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly allowed government on sentencing remand to introduce, for first time, plea colloquy transcript in support of its claim that defendant's prior conviction was for crime of violence under USSG § 2K2.1 because intervening case law making form of proof first offered unacceptable justified admission of additional evidence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Peters, No. 06-3079,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where, at trial, defendant was able to elicit quite a bit of information about the witness' mental health problems on cross-examination, and exclusion of the witness's prior convictions under Fed. R. Evid. 609 was harmless error, the appellate court affirmed the judgment the district court.
|
|||||
| United States v. Whitehead, No. 06-2403,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
